 |
International Skating Union Discussion Forums
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
northtexasdude
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 Posts: 168
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nowthen
Joined: 27 Feb 2010 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| She was rising rapidly and then totally crashed so I hope this works because she with her spins is good to watch but you need proper jumps and not get < ! e -2 -3 GOE but I know they are getting rid of !. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:50 am Post subject: Re: Caroline Zhang coaching change |
|
|
| northtexasdude wrote: | | http://www.usfsa.org/Story.asp?id=44810&type=media .... hopefully it helps. was hoping this would have come earlier in the year. |
I'm discouraged she only made the change because her coach was leaving the US. It seems like she's resigned herself to her fate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Winnipeg
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 1255
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmmmmm Resigning to a fate of losing, you might as well quit?
I didn't read that her rationale wasbecause her coach was leaving but I trust this came from other knowledge.
I wish her the best.
Is this the right coach for her? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loveskating
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 680
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Winnipeg wrote: | hmmmmm Resigning to a fate of losing, you might as well quit?
I didn't read that her rationale wasbecause her coach was leaving but I trust this came from other knowledge.
I wish her the best.
Is this the right coach for her? |
IMHO what is really sad is that a skater like Caroline Zhang, with such talent, and such wonderful intrinsic qualities who can really reach an audience evidently never got what she needed to succeed. That is downright sad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Winnipeg
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 1255
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| She still may achieve potential under a new coach? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| loveskating wrote: | | IMHO what is really sad is that a skater like Caroline Zhang, with such talent, and such wonderful intrinsic qualities who can really reach an audience evidently never got what she needed to succeed. That is downright sad. |
While I would agree with your assessment of Zhang's talent and abilities, there has to be some sort of serious attempt on the part of the skater and/or their team, to make this happen. Team Zhang did nothing to correct her technical problems and her coaching change last season (something I welcomed at the time) ended before it really started.
Nagasu made a similar change and it was obvious from Frank Carroll's comments, and Mirai's tweets and blogs that she was having a really tough time adjusting to Carroll's training methods. At one point he tossed out of a training session and told her to come back when she had a better attitude. She stuck it out and look how that turned out for her. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loveskating
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 680
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dragonlady wrote: | | loveskating wrote: | | IMHO what is really sad is that a skater like Caroline Zhang, with such talent, and such wonderful intrinsic qualities who can really reach an audience evidently never got what she needed to succeed. That is downright sad. |
While I would agree with your assessment of Zhang's talent and abilities, there has to be some sort of serious attempt on the part of the skater and/or their team, to make this happen. Team Zhang did nothing to correct her technical problems and her coaching change last season (something I welcomed at the time) ended before it really started.
Nagasu made a similar change and it was obvious from Frank Carroll's comments, and Mirai's tweets and blogs that she was having a really tough time adjusting to Carroll's training methods. At one point he tossed out of a training session and told her to come back when she had a better attitude. She stuck it out and look how that turned out for her. |
I'm referring to a longer time frame than that.
Nagasu had better jump technique back when she won Nationals the first time, before she went to Frank Carroll -- so I'm asking why is that? Why would it be that Caroline Zhang, who was around for a long time, evidently did not get the coaching she needed despite the fact she obviously had great intrinsic talent.
I have no idea, but I think the USFSA is responsible for all this. They certify the coaches! How come there are so many coaches that produce skaters who have bad lutzes etc? It is RAMPANT here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| loveskating wrote: | | IHow come there are so many coaches that produce skaters who have bad lutzes etc? It is RAMPANT here. |
Everyone involved in the skaters' development plays a part in this: the coaches, the USFSA and the parents. There is a huge push in the US to get all of the triples at the earliest possible age. A girl has NO HOPE of getting a Jr. Grand Prix assignment without them. The Jr. GP is the springboard to international success. And to get to the JGP you have to do well at Nationals.
The US girls have been cleaning up on the JGP since the series started. Except for the era of which started with Miki Ando and ended with Mao Asada and Yu-Na Kim, the US girls have owned the JGP and Jr. Worlds for the past 15 years and this is due to their jumping ability. But getting the lutz at an early age isn't easy.
Doing a triple lutz off the correct edge takes a great deal of upper body strength, something that prepubescent girls lack, especially the tiny slender girls who make the best figure skaters. They simply do not have the upper body strength necessary to ride that outside edge and take off. Knowing that getting the 3Z is necessary for a skater to have any hope of success, the coaches are under a lot of pressure from the parents to make it happen. All the money the parents have spend will go for naught if the girl doesn't place well at Nationals or get international assignments. Taking off from the inside edge means that girls can get their lutz at an earlier age, even if it is a flutz.
For the coaches, if the skater doesn't get the lutz (or flutz), the parents may move a student to another coach who isn't such a stickler for good technique. The coaches who's students are winning the most events are the ones who get the most talented students so again, there is pressure on the coach to get the girls doing the lutz by hook or by crook.
The USFSA judges seem to ignor the flutz in their marking domestically. Even after e! rule and deductions were imposed internationally, you'd never believe the US girls flutzed if you looked at their score sheets from Nationals. Dick Button ranted on about poor positions in layback spins and never so much as mentioned the flutz.
To be fair, it didn't seem to matter much to international judges for a long time either. Tara flutzed, as did Sarah Hughes and that didn't stop either of them from becoming Olympic Champions. Mao Asada became World Champion with a flutz. And Caroline Zhang racked up the highest scores ever seen on the junior circuit, higher even than Mao or Yu-Na, and she made the senior GPF in her first year of seniors.
From the days of Nicole Bobek and Tara Lipinski, the ISU judges didn't really deduct for the flutz. Skaters who flutz did get slightly lower technical scores but not from all of the judges. Underrotations didn't much matter either. CoP cracked down on both of them in a major way.
So while it might seem like a no-brainer that a coach should never let a student flutz, the reasons why it happens are all inter-connected to the figure skating powers that be deciding what it is they are going to reward. I remember a coach saying "If the judges are only giving out medals to kids with tiny, cheated jumps, I guess I'm going to start teaching them to my kids too".
In some regards, Caroline Zhang is something of a victim of the ISU crackdown on the flutz. She won everything she could possibly win as a Junior, both in the US and internationally, winning Jr. Worlds twice. She was a junior sensation with her huge scores and her pearl spin. If you were her parent or her coach, where would you ever get the message that her technique would be her downfall? Then the ISU really started cracking down with the e and the ! edge deductions. The judges really had no choice on the e deduction any longer and the judges at home stopped ignorning her flutz.
When she grew, Zhang lost speed and developed that dreadful mule kick. With the lack of height on her jumps and her slow speed go into them, she needs the extra vault that the high leg kick gives to get her body around on the jump. Her technique has gone from bad to dangerously bad as all of that wrenching of her hips and knees could lead to injury problems down the lline. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lambielfan26
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 3492
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even though she finished 3rd (a controversial 3rd) at the 2009 Nationals and missed the World team I actually believed after the 2009 season and her performances and how she was scored at Four Continents and the WTT events that Zhang would be the top American in the Olympic season. I definitely had her making the 2 women U.S Olympic team possibly as U.S Champion at that point. And there we were a year later and she was posting LP scores that were beatable by Yu Na Kim in a short program in some events, getting PCS comparable to McCorkell, and finishing TENTH at her own Nationals, missing the U.S Olympic team by only 8 placings, a team that by the time Nationals rolled around the consensus of everyone seemed to be she wasnt even a contender to make anymore. Wow things have gotten bad in a hurry for Mrs. Zhang. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chuckiem
Joined: 12 Nov 2005 Posts: 3958
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dragonlady wrote: | | When she grew, Zhang lost speed and developed that dreadful mule kick. |
Caroline had the mule kick into lutz and flip right from the start. But as she grew, she had to kick harder to get her body into the air, and that technique became more obvious.
Caroline was always on the slow side (as are many junior skaters when they start out), but she didn't develop more speed as she moved up to seniors.
However, her nemesis has always been UR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chuckiem wrote: | Caroline was always on the slow side (as are many junior skaters when they start out), but she didn't develop more speed as she moved up to seniors.
However, her nemesis has always been UR. |
Lack of speed into the jumps added to lack of spring on the take-off does tend to lead to problems rotating the jumps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loveskating
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 680
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chuckiem wrote: | | Dragonlady wrote: | | When she grew, Zhang lost speed and developed that dreadful mule kick. |
Caroline had the mule kick into lutz and flip right from the start. But as she grew, she had to kick harder to get her body into the air, and that technique became more obvious.
Caroline was always on the slow side (as are many junior skaters when they start out), but she didn't develop more speed as she moved up to seniors.
However, her nemesis has always been UR. |
Sarah Hughes had a mule kick when she won OGM and massive URs, and she consistently made the podium in the GP. The last top US lady who did not fluz for real was Nancy Kerrigan if I recall! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Except that Sarah rotated her jumps at the Olympics and she certainly didn't mule kick like Zhang. Sarah also had the best basic skating of all of the US ladies, save Kwan. Please note that in the run-up to SLC, Sarah Hughes beat Sasha Cohen in every international competition they were both entered in and Hughes was the only skater to beat both Kwan and Slutskaya before SLC.
Sarah benefitted from being the only top skater in the world who was consistently landing 3/3's and attempting 7-triple programs at the time, from staying on her feet, and from her strong stroking, clean edges and very nice spins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loveskating
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 680
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dragonlady wrote: | Except that Sarah rotated her jumps at the Olympics and she certainly didn't mule kick like Zhang. Sarah also had the best basic skating of all of the US ladies, save Kwan. Please note that in the run-up to SLC, Sarah Hughes beat Sasha Cohen in every international competition they were both entered in and Hughes was the only skater to beat both Kwan and Slutskaya before SLC.
Sarah benefitted from being the only top skater in the world who was consistently landing 3/3's and attempting 7-triple programs at the time, from staying on her feet, and from her strong stroking, clean edges and very nice spins. |
Well, I did not reach all those issues -- my only point was that the USFSA has a long history of not teaching American girls how to do the lutz properly -- and other issues of fundamentals as well! Again, I do not agree with your analysis because all the young Russian girls do not flutz.
However, since you went to these other issues, so will I.
Sarah at Olympics: Second jump in flutz combo is under rotated by almost a full half turn on the ice, as obvious as it gets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5xZX-pSZqw&feature=related
The steps into the flutz do not disguise the HUGE kick (see at at approximately frame 209).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2KYnyBI3JU&feature=related
I rather liked Sarah Hughes' skating myself and I certainly thought she had the elements over Kwan -- she had great spins, lots of variation, like the back catch spin, COE camel spin at times, not a bad spiral, and her layback was to die for, along with Sasha Cohen's and Nikodinov's. She did some real transitions like sprial into jumps no edge change and had 3/3 combinations. I respected her skating a lot, and especially how she improved her split falling leaf so that it was more than respectible for the OLympics, but she flutzed and had a horrible back kick on her flutz and she did underrotate some jumps, inluding at this Olympics.
I never agreed that her edging was so great (nice, but not great) because she put so much resistance to the edges with her body, maybe because she was rather tall? The fundamental evidence of great edges is in the flow over the ice, flow with speed, which you cannot achieve without great posture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| loveskating wrote: | | Well, I did not reach all those issues -- my only point was that the USFSA has a long history of not teaching American girls how to do the lutz properly -- and other issues of fundamentals as well! Again, I do not agree with your analysis because all the young Russian girls do not flutz. |
The young Russian girls are not taught the lutz at such an early age, at least the ones trained in Russia aren't. The Russian school is very big on teaching strong basic skating before jumping. This is why the Russian skaters generally have strong skating skills. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Winnipeg
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 1255
|
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If there is a system of coaching and developing a skater that 'works,' why doesn't everyone follow that approach? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loveskating
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 680
|
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Also, someone who is a good spinner ought to be a good jumper if there are no issues of height (like for example, Lucinda Rue was too tall to be a good jumper). Caroline Zhang has great spins and she is short, so jumping should be no problem for her. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 Posts: 3670 Location: Edge of reason
|
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The ability to jump has more to do with timing and twitch muscles than height. Height becomes a factor due to necessity of maintaining an upright air position as recovery from a lean is much more difficult for a tall person than a short one.
Caroline lacks height on her jumps and height can most definitely be taught. The Mariposa Skating School has a great jumping program and it starts with skaters learning how to get good spring on their jumps. How to get down into the knees on take-off and use their arms to propel them up into the air.
Winnipeg: every skater is different in terms of learning. The Russian skating school is based on strong basic skating and until that's mastered, they don't move on to the tricks so they start jumping later. "Russian stroking" is strong, powerful and generally on clean edges. You seldom hear is said that a Russian skater has "weak stroking" or shallow edges. This is why so many Russian skaters get high marks even when they don't land their tricks. Speed, power and ease of movement are hallmarks of the Russian school of figure skating.
But the emphasis on the basic often comes at the expense of the tricks. Russian skaters are particularly weak in spins. Even Irina Slutskaya, arguably the best Russian spinner ever, had problems with travelling and some sloppiness in her entries and exits. Her layback did not have the classic refined position either. Other than a nice, streched camel spin, Plushenko had the worst spins of any skater to win Worlds that I can remember. His spins improved markedly under CoP but they were never great.
Canadian Men are known as generally known as jumpers. Canadians executed the first 3Z (Don Jackson) in competition, the first 3A (Vern Taylor), the first 3A combo (Orser) and first quad (Browning) and the first quad combo (Stojko). Would that we could teach the women to jump as well as the men. They also have strong basics, although the Russians are way out in front on this one.
US women are known as strong jumpers and spinners due to the early age at which they start jumping. This (as previously discussed) has lead to an epidemic of flutzing in an effort to get all of the triples as young as possible, and a tendency to weaker basic skating as all the emphasis seems to be on the tricks: sort of the polar opposite to the Russian School. The US women have won more OGM's in women's skating than any other nation, although the Russians are leading in all other categories.
The Japanese have tried to borrow the best from both worlds: beautiful basic skating and great jumping. They've even suggested that the coaches train their students in figures to improve their blade control for CoP footwork and transitions. While Japan is on top of the singles world in figure skating at the moment, it will be interesting to see how long they can sustain this and whether the next generation of skaters can hold on to this dominance.
Looking at the US dominance in singles at the Junior level over the past quadrennial, I would say that this junior dominance will spill over into seniors over the next four years, and possibly pairs, as the overabundance of male talent leads to more guys who can't break through as singles skaters, taking up pairs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northtexasdude
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| loveskating wrote: | | Also, someone who is a good spinner ought to be a good jumper if there are no issues of height (like for example, Lucinda Rue was too tall to be a good jumper). Caroline Zhang has great spins and she is short, so jumping should be no problem for her. |
a few outstanding spinners come to my mind.... Nathalie Krieg (from the old days). Even further back, Kay Thomson from CAN, more recently Czisny. All have spins that can cause standing ovations, but the jumps caused them problems. I would say a good spinner doesn't always = good jumper, as the take-off technique is completely different.
...sorry to go off topic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|